However, they won't say: the times were dark
Rather: why were the poets silent?
Brecht, 1936
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
alright then
---
---
-----
---
---
{LIME TREE}
- Aerial/Edge
- aerialedgeblog
- ILLUMINATED MEAT
- The Old Sentence
- photos
- 2nd Balcony
- alli's
- bathybius
- chicksdigpoetry
- Comix
- Compton
- the delay
- Detainees
- drnk&wlk
- Equanimity
- the phactory
- des fantômes par elle
- & further
- for birds II
- Thurston
- Intl Exchange
- Jane
- Lemon Hound
- lisablog
- Little Red's
- look
- mainstream
- Modern Americans
- mole
- mole fizz
- mongibeddu
- Nervous
- Noah
- NOTES
- odalisqued
- Overlap
- parisblog
- PhillySound
- "The Power"
- Silliman's
- snips
- SWOONROCKET
- Times Infinity
- atonalist
- ululations
- Virgin Form
- WallaceThinks
- WEB LOG
- well-nourished
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(230)
-
▼
January
(19)
- Mungo
- However, they won't say: the times were darkRather...
- kari edwards memorial reading
- Jules Boykoff on NPR
- exacting surfacezoundsparental (a mucus-lute) rune...
- No title
- wtf?
- MP3: Infinite Mixtape #51: Deerhunter: "Spring Hal...
- "discourse"
- the i.e. reading series welcomes Graham Foust, Chr...
- No title
- Coconut
- Un site illégal veut acheter une île
- Brian Howe Spider Poems Remix
- Snow said Friday
- spam situationists
- No title
- Robot New Years Resolutions & Zombie Haiku
- No title
-
▼
January
(19)
1 comment:
Has there ever actually been a historical moment when the poets were silent? I can't think of one. Confused, yes. Wrong, yes. But silent?
Post a Comment